In this essay, you will write a critical analysis of the argument that you recorded earlier in the semester.

/0 Comments/in /by

In this essay, you will write a critical analysis of the argument that you recorded earlier in the semester. You will utilize the principles of argumentative logic that you have studied this semester and your critical thinking skills to conduct this analysis. This assignment will strengthen your understanding of what makes a good argument and will prepare you to write your final argumentative essay. This assignment has two parts. PART I: ANALYZE YOUR ARGUMENT Write down the conclusion of your argument (the position you took on the issue) and the premises (or main reasons) that you presented to support your conclusion. Takes notes on the explanations and/or examples that you used to support your premises. Identify any errors of critical thinking, logical fallacies, erroneous facts, or missing facts that you think were needed to support your premises. DONT INCLUDE THESE NOTES IN YOUR ESSAY! After you finish the above steps, complete Part II of the assignment. PART II: WRITE THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS Your critical analysis should be formatted as follows: INTRODUCTION: Write an introduction that includes: A brief introduction to the topic – this should include approximately five to six sentences summarizing the article and the controversy that it describes. Your argument (conclusion + premises) written as a series of statements in numbered list form, ending with your conclusion. You can see an example of this here: Example of standardized argument.pdf A good way to introduce your standardized argument is to write: “The argument I made on the issue is as follows:” BODY PARAGRAPHS: Write a critical analysis of your argument by analyzing each of your premises and the explanation/examples associated with that premise. Each premise of your argument and its supporting explanation/examples should be analyzed in a separate paragraph (so, if your argument had three premises, your essay will have three body paragraphs). Your analysis you should include answers to the following questions: Was this premise adequately explained or supported with examples? Why or why not? Does this part of the argument (the premise and its support) contain any errors of critical thinking or logical fallacies? If so, which errors/fallacies were committed? Why were these errors committed? CONCLUSION: Begin with a sentence or two that summarizes what you found in your analysis (e.g. “This analysis shows that the argument I made was…”). Then, respond to these questions: Are you satisfied with the argument that you made? Why or why not? Could the argument you made be improved? How (specifically) would you improve it? Please note that this is NOT an argumentative essay! DO NOT write an argument on the issue; instead, ANALYZE the argument that you already made in your essay.

My Experience with Nnivo

/0 Comments/in /by

My Experience with Nnivo
Nnivo Software gives an enjoyable experience as one of the main computer assisted quality data analysis software. My experience with Nnivo software in coding my data greatly enhanced my data analysis. The software facilitates an accurate as well as transparent data analysis process. Moreover, the software provided me with a quick and simple mechanism of counting particular data from the subjects. It also provided an effective framework for attaining reliability. Therefore, Nnivo helped me interrogate my data at a specific level. This led to an improvement in validity and reliability or the rigor of the analysis process as it help validate or reject the impression of the researcher of the data. Challenge
The challenge of Nnivo, however, widens the gap between the researcher and the data. For example, the software does many things and hence as a researcher is distanced from the data, and this encourage quantitative analysis of qualitative data. Moreover, this creates a homogeneity in methods across the social sciences (Welsh, 2002). Another challenge I experienced with the Nnivo is continuous and challenging tempt to re-code a sub-set whenever I ask a question of the data and obtain a sub-set of the data as a response. Moreover, it is hard to decide when and how to stop coding and sit back to think some thematic connection possibilities across the data. Advantages
One of the advantages of this software is ensuring reliability and validity or vigor leading to raised accuracy. For example, the search facility in Nnivo seen by the product designers as key in enhancing data interrogation. Particularly, this feature is effective when data are searched based on their attributes. Therefore, the researcher gets a reliable result when Nnivo is employed rather than a manual mechanism to code data since Nnivo rules out the probability of human error. Thus, for studies that call for a need to gain an overall impression of the data that is not unduly influenced by specific memorable accounts, the software is effective. There is an increased confident in the interpretation of data when Nnivo is used as compared to manual data cutting and pasting of pieces of text. This is because, Nnivo coding process is quick relative to manual coding as more coding take place and hence the additional coding may lead to effective understanding of the data. Disadvantage
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
My Experience with Nnivo

Provide a comprehensive statement of the problem using the epidemiological process including the distribution, determinants, and deterrents.

/0 Comments/in /by

How to improve Nutrition in the elderly. Target group is nursing staff from one facility. 2. Diabetes in Older Adults. Target group is nursing staff from one facility.
Power point Presentation (20 slides each WITH NOTES, GRAPHICS)
Topics:

1. How to improve Nutrition in the elderly. Target group is nursing staff from one facility.

2. Diabetes in Older Adults. Target group is nursing staff from one facility.

3. How to Overcome Language Barriers in Healthcare. Target group is nursing staff from one facility.

Provide a comprehensive statement of the problem using the epidemiological process including the distribution, determinants, and deterrents.

Incorporate at least four current literature review findings as a theoretical base for your project/paper.

Describe community resources available to meet the need of the specific community in this problem area. Summarize the resources available and describe their effectiveness for the community.

Describe your selected group. Identify and summarize the learner needs of your selected group. What are the needs? Why does this group need to be educated on your chosen topic?

Identify and describe developmental and teaching/learning theory/theories used and why they are appropriate to the learners you targeted.

Describe in behavioral terms your specific planning process for your project and overall teaching goal for your participants.

Evaluate your teaching experience. Reflect on the following questions. What went well? What did not? What would you change if you were teaching this topic to a similar group at a later date and why?

RUBRICS

Provides a comprehensive statement of the problem using the epidemiological process including the distribution, determinants, and deterrents. Describes the selected group, and identifies and summarizes the learner needs of the selected group, including why this group needs to be educated on the chosen topic.

Describes the community resources available to meet the need of the specific community in this problem area. Summarizes the resources available and describes their effectiveness for the community. Identifies and describes developmental and teaching/learning theory/theories used and why they are appropriate to the learners targeted. Describes in behavioral terms the specific planning process for the project and overall teaching goal for the participants. Incorporates at least four current literature review findings as a theoretical base for the project/paper.

Evaluates the teaching experience. Reflects on the following questions: What went well? What did not go well? What would you change if you were teaching this topic to a similar group at a later date and why?

Writing is clear, concise, formal, and organized. Slides are mostly error free. Information from sources is paraphrased appropriately and accurately referenced and cited in APA style. A title slide, clear introduction and conclusion, and reference slide are included. The number of references required by the assignment is presented. In-text APA citations are used in the presentation.