Clearly identify your topic or arguments in the research paper (critically engage with the topic or can disagree with some parts and give evidence to support your

Bone Marrow donation in children in Australia
Order Description
Assessment: Outline
Description: Outline for a research paper. The outline for research paper must contain a synopsis of the research topic; literature review (one page or 1.25 page); and
research methodology. It should explain the issues you propose to explore; justify the contribution that the paper is making to scholarship; identify and justify the
methods to be adopted and identify relevant preliminary and secondary sources.
Topic: Looking at issues of born marrow transplantation donors in Children in Australia.
(Could you help me with an appropriate title please-Not too lengthy)
Synopsis: reference when you use someones work otherwise dont need it.
literature review (1 page or 1.15 page) simply acknowledge broadly very brief highlight key issues how to deal with them or take different approaches/ or issues have
not discussed or addressed from the current law practice legislations or current clinical practice).
Research methodology: 1. Doctrinal (Critically engage with law legislations or case law regulations)
2. Comparative (different states of the comparison in Australia e.g. Victoria V.S. NSW V.S Queensland )
3. Conceptual (where you make an argument about a concept or idea and this is definitely where you would make ethical arguments and also perhaps a legal argument)
4. Clearly identify your topic or arguments in the research paper (critically engage with the topic or can disagree with some parts and give evidence to support your
arguments. Arguments in which you must consider both ethical legal moral philosophical economic political cultural or social issues that are relevant to the
issue (Ethical & legal parts are must economic philosophical political social critically analyse it ). Critically analysis or reflection. Tell the readers how you
will do it/ you are going to do conceptive analysis for example. Also consider these selected ethical principles: utilitarianism; deontology; right-based approaches;
justice approaches; virtue theories; autonomy; beneficence; non-maleficience; human rights (Do not use all ethical principles; selective picked some that are important
to your topic ); explore issues in depth analysis; major significant changes from the past up to now. Ethical issues in bone marrow: Intimate attachments parental
autonomy paternalism substituted judgement; parent patriae power; conflicts between healthcare professionals; parents and children donator; autonomy of child (right
to refuse or participate); valid consent; best interests of child; potential conflicts.
5. Legal issues legal acts and legislations relating to bone marrow donor. (Consider things have not addressed or discussed yet in current legislations clinical
practice as well as law practice).
6.The scope of your paper (relatively narrow topic) recently contained.
Healthcare paper topic: system (legal issues) & beside issues
7. 3 pages in contents; APA referencing consistently
8. Research proposal (bullet points or headings subheadings properly are acceptable)
9. If contexts are 3 pages in length referencing page can go over page 4.

This assignment is meant to prepare you for that final and to demonstrate you are working on it throughout the semester.

Human SexualityAssignment: You will compose one essay for this course the final essay. This assignment is meant to prepare you for that final and to demonstrate you are working on it throughout the semester. The final essay should have a complicated argument (thesis) in place that is opinionated, clear, and will allow for in-depth analytical work invested in sexual or affective subject matter. An essay should also demonstrate that the writer can identify multiple areas from a primary text(s) worth unpacking, breaking down for sub-textual meaning. Finally, that essay should demonstrate that a writer has considered and chosen appropriate, relevant, and credible sources from research to support a major or minor claims and/or concepts raised with analysis. The thesis/annotated bibliography assignment allows you to demonstrate you are considering actively each of these three components. To do that, you should Devote three full pages of writing in MLA format, detailing your argument and areas from your primary text(s) that you plan on exploring in the final essay. Your tone with this assignment should reflect a writer in the planning stages of a draft, so you will write as though you are proposing this writing project to me. Your argument should be made clear, but you do not have to identify in detail those in-depth discoveries your analysis will make only gesture to moments from the text where you feel you might find productive material for unpacking. Then, you will provide at least five entries for an annotated bibliography, which is another type of planning document. You will cite authors, titles, publication info for each of these sources and include at least a 100-word paragraph following each, where you will identify why this source has potential impact for supporting a major or minor claim or can substantiate details from analysis. At least two of these sources must reflect academic research. This component of the assignment must span around 1 pages and should follow MLA format. Your ideas can shift, progress, or move on totally as you encounter other texts this semester. For that reason, consider the thesis/annotated bibliography assignment a planning document, which you should be revising in the final weeks of the semester as you develop the final essay. Grading criteria A clear, opinionated argument is generated that points toward the ability to sustain an in-depth analysis over eight pages for the final essay The text explains several key moments from primary text(s) worth exploring on a detail-oriented level that supports the argumentative approach Bibliography identifies good sources (at least two academic) worth folding into analysis to explore a concept or support a major or minor argumentative claim

The Gap between rich and poor & widening income inequality

The Gap between rich and poor & widening income inequalityThis is a Proposal paper and is on the social problem of -The Gap between rich and poor & widening income inequality is the defining challenge of our time. Social inequality refers to disparities in the distribution of economic assets and income as well as between the overall quality and luxury of each person’s existence within a society, while economic inequality is caused by the unequal accumulation of wealth; social inequality exists because of the lack of wealth in The distribution of wealth is a comparison of the wealth of various members or groups in a society. It differs from the income distribution in that it looks at the distribution of ownership of the assets in a society, rather than the current income of members of that society. In advanced economies, the gap between the rich and poor is at its highest level in decades. Some of the simple topics to cover are : What are the economic causes of inequalities? Why is distribution of wealth important? What is the cause of income inequality? How does inequality affect poverty? How does inequality affect people’s lives? What causes the gap between rich and poor? Why is the gap between rich and poor countries widening? What steps can be taken to reduce inequalities? first, construct an argument on why the chosen topic is important. People who work in non-profits, academia, schools, state and city governments, and other organizations are frequently asked to propose ideas before getting to work on them. For example, many non-profits rely on grant money in order to operate; they submit proposals to funding agencies who then decide if the nonprofits ideas/goals/aims are worth funding. In the academic world, we often have to submit grant proposals in order to get funding for our research. submit a 3-page double-spaced proposal. 1. An introduction to your topic and its significance–What is the issue at stake? Who is the targeted population that your issue affects? Why should we care? Who are the stakeholders? That is, whose attention are you aiming to grab by introducing this topic and therefore writing the proposal? 2. Methods — How do you plan to address this issue? (i.e., conducting research through data collection, is this a pre-existing problem with a set of “solutions” that have proven to be ineffective? How can you work towards rectifying its wrongs, if applicable? Is funding needed to solve this issue? If so, how much? What ideas do you have in generating funding? 3. Provide a list of 3 empirical sources that you are drawing from to situate your issue.