Hi W33818, I hope this is not too much. I want to stick with you because you know what you are doing very good JOB Thank you. You have a substantial and clear background of our work already, and it just makes perfect sense that I continue with you. Please refer to the work done in: 1. #248389 – Problem Description 2. #248392 – Literature Support PICOT: In adult tube feeding patients, which Is more effective in preventing aspiration throughout the length of the feeding therapy, gastric or post-pyloric? Write a 2500-word paper for your proposed evidencebased practice project SOLUTION. Address the following criteria: 1. Proposed Solution: The use of Post-Pyloric tubes is SUPERIOR in preventing aspiration during tube feeding compared to Gastric tubes. (a) Describe the proposed solution (or intervention) for the problem and the way(s) in which it is consistent with current evidence. Heavily reference and provide substantial evidence for your solution or intervention. We can use the same literature/references/evidence we used in the literature support. (b) Is the solution realistic in your setting, too costly, or is there a lack of appropriate training available to deliver the intervention? 2. Organization Culture: Explain the way(s) in which the proposed solution is consistent with the organization or community culture and resources. *** We described the organizational readiness for EBP in #247771; Please see attached file for added reference. 3. Outcomes: Explain the expected outcomes of the project. The outcomes should flow from the PICOT. 4. Method to Achieve Outcomes: Develop an OUTLINE of how the outcomes will be achieved. List any SPECIFIC BARRIERS that will need to be assessed and eliminated. How would you address the barriers? Make sure to mention any assumptions or limitations which may also need to be addressed. 5. Outcome Impact: How does the USE OF POST-PYLORIC TUBES affect or impact the outcomes on one or all of the following indicators (as appropriate): (a) quality care improvement, (b) patientcentered quality care, (c) efficiency of processes, (d) environmental changes, and/or (e) professional expertise? *** Please present PROPOSED SOLUTION in detail, consistent with current evidence and is heavily supported by evidence and literature. *** Please provide a thorough explanation with examples about the ways in which the proposed solution is consistent with the organization or community culture and resources. *** Please draw Warranted and Relevant conclusions. The expected outcomes are explained in-depth. A detailed outline of how the outcomes will be achieved is developed and describes the impact the outcomes will have on one or all of the following indicators (as appropriate): quality care improvement, patient-centered quality care, efficiency of processes, environmental changes, and/or professional expertise.
https://anursingresearchpaper.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/logo-transparent-300x60.png 0 0 dennis https://anursingresearchpaper.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/logo-transparent-300x60.png dennis2022-03-26 10:54:332022-03-26 10:54:33Describe the proposed solution (or intervention) for the problem and the way(s) in which it is consistent with current evidence.